ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2026
Cyclopia, A Rare and Lethal Congenital Anomaly: Report of Two Cases, 2025.
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cyclopia is an extremely rare and fatal congenital anomaly in which causes are not commonly known. This condition is marked by the failure of the eye orbits to properly divide, resulting in a single eye field or closely positioned eye fields. There is no specific treatment, and the prognosis is generally poor with most babies dying shortly after birth or during infancy. Case Presentation: These two newborns were born to multiparous mothers, which died soon after birth. Diagnosis was made postpartum with centrally located single eye and long proboscis on the midline of the forehead, with the second had associated with cystic hygroma. Both cases had no other gross visible congenital anomalies on the extremities, abdomen, and head. But other anomalies as renal, central nervous system, cardiac and chromosomal anomalies cannot be excluded. Conclusion: Both cases had died immediately, and health professionals should experience with detailed antenatal ultrasound scanning to detect these congenital anomalies antepartum for better counseling of patients. Routine antenatal ultrasound assessment is crucial in low resource countries where ultrasound scanning is commonly done in higher health facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.