ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2026
Eccentric Training for Tendinopathies in Athletes: A Scoping Review and Evidence Gap Map.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tendinopathies are prevalent in athletic populations, particularly in sports requiring repetitive high-load activities. Eccentric training is widely recommended for rehabilitation, yet variability in protocols and inconsistent methodological reporting limit standardization. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence on eccentric training for tendinopathies in athletes, characterize intervention parameters, evaluate clinical outcomes and safety, and identify methodological gaps to inform future practice and research. Searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were conducted. Eligible studies included athletes with tendinopathy undergoing eccentric training interventions. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials were considered. Data extraction included intervention design, tendon site, loading parameters, outcomes, and adverse events. Critical appraisal was performed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Thirty-one studies were included. Most examined patellar tendinopathy in volleyball and basketball players or Achilles tendinopathy in runners and soccer athletes. Protocols varied substantially in load, frequency, and progression strategies. Pain monitoring was integral, often allowing exercise into moderate discomfort. Eccentric training consistently improved pain and function, with heavy slow resistance and adjunct modalities showing comparable or additive effects. Return-to-sport rates were high, and adverse events were minimal. However, performance outcomes, tendon structure, and safety reporting were inconsistently assessed. Eccentric training consistently reduces pain and improves function in athletes with tendinopathy. Evidence is less consistent regarding performance outcomes, tendon remodeling, and comparative superiority over alternative interventions. Standardized reporting of protocols, safety, and sport-specific adaptations is needed to strengthen recommendations for athletic rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.