SynthesisJournal of sports science & medicine2026
Machine Learning Applications in Non-Contact Lower Limb Sports Injury Prediction: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting athletic performance in track and field athletes based on wearable physiological and psychological indicators: an interpretable machine learning study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction of ACL loading during the wide lunge: a multifactorial coupling analysis based on kinematic and electromyographic signals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-contact Lower limb sports injuries represent some of the most prevalent and impactful conditions within athletic populations, prompting increasing interest in predictive approaches that can inform prevention and rehabilitation strategies. With its capacity to manage high-dimensional and complex datasets, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool for injury risk prediction. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesized evidence from studies retrieved through Web of Science, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus (EBSCO). The literature search was conducted on January 20, 2025. Following independent screening and risk of bias assessment using the PROBAST tool, 15 studies were included from an initial pool of 92. The majority of study populations comprised adult athletes, with basketball and football (soccer) being the most frequently investigated sports. Random Forest and logistic regression were the most commonly applied algorithms, while tree-based approaches yielded the strongest predictive performance in 6 studies. Across 14 studies, area under the curve (AUC) values were reported, with one CHAID-based decision tree achieving the highest performance (AUC = 0.91), and sensitivity values reaching up to 0.92 in eight studies. Importantly, model interpretability was addressed in 87% of included studies, underscoring its emerging importance for clinical translation. Overall, ML exhibits considerable potential in predicting non-contact lower-limb injuries, but its practical value depends on achieving a balance between accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Future research should emphasize the integration of multi-source data and large-scale prospective validation to advance the translation of ML models into precision injury prevention and rehabilitation practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.