ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Fracture and mortality outcomes by osteoporosis treatment route in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a propensity-matched registry study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of antiresorptive osteoporosis pharmacologic treatments on fracture incidence and survival in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with subgroup analysis by treatment route. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a national registry of patients with T2DM and osteoporosis. Patients receiving antiresorptive treatments (oral or intravenous/subcutaneous [IV/SC]) were compared to untreated individuals using propensity score matching. The primary outcomes were major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations, including subgroup analyses by BMI and HbA1c. Results: Among 8,788 matched patients, treatment was associated with significantly lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78-0.94) but not with reduced fracture incidence (HR 1.11; 95% CI: 0.96-1.29). In the treated subgroup (N = 2,960), IV/SC therapy was associated with reduced fracture risk (HR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35-0.94) but increased mortality (HR 1.63; 95% CI: 1.35-1.96) compared to oral treatment. Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity, osteoporosis treatment was associated with improved survival but not reduced fracture risk. Injectable therapies offered greater fracture protection but were linked to higher mortality, likely due to confounding by indication. Poor adherence may limit the effectiveness of oral treatments in routine care. These findings underscore the need for individualized osteoporosis management strategies in high-risk diabetic populations and raise important considerations regarding the optimal route of administration in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.