Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710399›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Digital Transformation and Team-Based Care: Pharmacists in Multidisciplinary Models - A Narrative Review.

Asma M Alshahrani, Rajalakshimi Vasudevan, Amjad Hmlan, Abdullah Mohammed Assiri, Ahmad Mohammed Asiri, Omar Ahmed M Asiri, Ali Abduh Mashni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asma M AlshahraniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Shaqra University, Dawadimi, Saudi Arabia.
Rajalakshimi VasudevanDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1173-7724
Amjad HmlanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Mohammed AssiriDepartment of Medical and Dental Supplies, Medical Services, Ministry of Interior, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Mohammed AsiriKhamis Mushayt General Hospital, Aseer Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Khamis Mushait, 62433, Saudi Arabia.
Omar Ahmed M AsiriKhamis Mushayt General Hospital, Aseer Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Khamis Mushait, 62433, Saudi Arabia.
Ali Abduh MashniKhamis Mushayt General Hospital, Aseer Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Khamis Mushait, 62433, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems worldwide are increasingly challenged by the rise in chronic diseases, aging populations, and the growing demand for personalized care. Traditional models, where healthcare professionals operate independently with limited interdisciplinary communication are proving insufficient to meet the complex and interconnected needs of modern patients. Objective: This review explores the growing importance of innovative and multidisciplinary approaches in healthcare, with a specific focus on the expanding role of pharmacists and the integration of digital tools. Unlike reviews that examine either multidisciplinary care or digital health in isolation, this review integrates evidence on how pharmacists function as clinical and digital connectors within multidisciplinary care models across diverse health systems. Methods: This narrative review synthesized evidence on multidisciplinary care models that integrate pharmacists and digital tools. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched (2015-March 2024) using terms related to multidisciplinary care, pharmacists/clinical pharmacy, and digital health (e.g. EHRs, telehealth, AI, mHealth). English-language peer-reviewed studies describing pharmacist integration in team-based and/or technology-enabled care were included; grey literature and non-peer-reviewed sources were excluded. Results: Across multiple care models, pharmacist integration in multidisciplinary teams was associated with improved chronic disease indicators (eg, better blood pressure or glycaemic control), fewer medication-related problems, including reports of reduced medication errors (eg, ~45% reduction in rural telepharmacy settings), and reduced avoidable hospitalizations/readmissions in transition-of-care settings. Digital innovations such as clinical decision support and telehealth platforms further enhanced coordination and continuity of care, enabling timely medication optimization and follow-up. Case studies from the UK, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Australia, India and South Africa selected LMICs illustrate context-adapted and scalable approaches. Conclusion: When supported by enabling policy frameworks and robust digital infrastructure, multidisciplinary healthcare models offer a powerful solution to many of today's healthcare challenges. Empowering pharmacists, investing in interoperable technologies, and reforming education and reimbursement structures are critical next steps toward resilient, patient-centered healthcare systems.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in healthcareclinical pharmacydigital healthhealth informaticsinterprofessional collaborationmedication therapy managementmultidisciplinary healthcarepharmacist integrationpharmacogenomicstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41710399
PMCPMC12912030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.