ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Construction of a Management Plan for Physical Activity Symptom Clusters in Hospitalized Stroke Patients.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To construct a scientifically sound and reliable management protocol for the physical activity symptom clusters in hospitalized stroke patients, based on the Symptom Management Theory (SMT). Methods: This methodological study employed a multi-step approach. First, a preliminary protocol was drafted based on a systematic literature review and best evidence summary. Second, a two-round Delphi expert consultation process was conducted to refine and validate the protocol. Statistical analysis included calculating the positive coefficient, authority coefficient (Cr), coefficient of variation (CV), and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W). Results: Fifteen experts completed both consultation rounds. The expert positivity rates were 83.33% and 100%, respectively. The authority coefficients (Cr) were 0.89 and 0.91. The first round yielded a CV of 0.00-0.14 and a Kendall's W of 0.195 ( Conclusion: The developed management protocol for the management protocol demonstrates strong scientific validity, reliability, and practical applicability. It serves as a valuable tool for healthcare professionals to develop personalized care plans, potentially enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life for stroke patients. Future studies are required to test its efficacy in multi-center trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.