Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710295›Full record

ArticleJournal of blood medicine2026

Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Thrombocythemia Risk During Third Generation Cephalosporin Therapy.

Kailei Du, Maofeng Wang, Ping Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kailei DuIntensive Care Medicine, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, 322100, People's Republic of China.
Maofeng WangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences Laboratory, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, 322100, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-0461
Ping YuDepartment of Gynecology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, 322100, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Third-generation cephalosporins are widely used for severe infections but carry thrombocythemia risks complicating therapeutic decisions. Current predictive tools lack accuracy and clinical interpretability. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for thrombocythemia risk stratification during cephalosporin therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 45,779 adults treated with third-generation cephalosporins (2019-2023) was analyzed. After exclusions (age <18, missing data, baseline platelet anomalies), 25,707 patients were included. Thrombocythemia was defined as platelet count >400×10 Results: XGBoost demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest test-set discrimination (AUC=0.858, 95% CI:0.814-0.902) and calibration (Brier score=0.0088). SHAP analysis identified Baseline platelet count (PLT), red blood cell count (RBC), creatinine (CRE), daily usage frequency, and sex as key drivers. PLT was the strongest predictor (SHAP range: -1.67 to +1.48), with lower PLT exerting protective effects. RBC and CRE ranked second and third in importance, showing nonlinear risk relationships. Key clinical interactions included amplified risk from malignancies (SHAP=-0.215) and protective effects of female sex (SHAP=-0.194). Conclusion: This interpretable ML framework enables precise thrombocythemia risk prediction during cephalosporin therapy, balancing algorithmic performance with clinical actionability.

Indexed as

machine learningrisk predictionthird-generation cephalosporinthrombocythemiaXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41710295
PMCPMC12912166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.