ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Patient's healthcare needs in the traditional and technological neuro-rehabilitation field: a survey methodological approach.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying needs in adult rehabilitation to support the clinical implementation of robotics and allied technologies: an Italian national survey.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, many robotic devices and technologies have been developed to support rehabilitation. These technologies have started penetrating clinical practice, and healthcare practitioners have started to be trained in their use, but only in selected healthcare environments. As a matter of fact, several barriers still exist for a wider dissemination of robotics-assisted rehabilitation, and little is known about the real needs of patients and their caregivers when they undertake a rehabilitation process. To address this issue a survey has been developed as a preparatory step for the effective use of robots and technologies in rehabilitation. The survey aims to identify and highlight patient's needs which are often unexpressed, enabling the co-creation of future rehabilitation solutions with patients and their caregivers. Methods: The methodology for developing the survey involves reaching out to as many people with neurological disorders as possible, understanding their needs in relation to specific functional areas, and using innovative methods such as online platforms to maximize outreach. Common functional domains for different neurological conditions were developed with a holistic view of people with disabilities, using the categories and domains defined by the new International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Results: Surveys addressed to patients, caregivers of adults and of children were developed by sharing the same content and exploring the rehabilitation carried out, both traditional and technological, with particular focus on the willingness to adopt technology, if not yet integrated in the current care. Discussion: This approach aims to develop future rehabilitation strategies that utilize the increasing availability of neurorehabilitation technologies in a more effective and personalized way. This study highlights the importance of focusing on the fundamental role of addressing patients' needs in driving innovation and adoption of neurorehabilitation technologies, prior to clinical effectiveness. This is pivotal in identifying the specific desiderata, to co-create together with the end users new solutions to empower the patient-professional relationship and optimize the satisfaction related to the treatment and, as a consequence, the adherence to the intervention and its results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.