ArticleThe breast journal2026
Mastitis and Mammary Abscess Management Audit (MAMMA): A Survey of Patients' Perspective on the Management of Mammary Abscesses in the UK.
Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recent Mastitis and Mammary Abscess Management Audit demonstrated widespread variation in the management of breast abscesses across the United Kingdom (UK), with up to one-fifth undergoing surgical drainage rather than image-guided needle aspiration. The impact of these practices on patient's perspective and quality of life is unclear. This study aimed to assess patients' experiences following breast abscess treatment, focusing on treatment modality, cosmesis, breastfeeding and quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between February and August 2024, aimed at UK-wide adult women with a history of breast abscess. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed using SPSS and NVivo software, with multiple imputation for missing data. Results: Of 172 participants, half underwent needle aspiration (50.58%), while 23.84% received surgical incision and drainage. Among those undergoing surgery, 68.29% reported prolonged wound healing, 85.37% experienced permanent scarring and a significant negative impact on their breast appearance ( Discussion: This study is the first to investigate patients' experiences of breast abscess management, highlighting significant variability in practice and the association of worse cosmetic and breastfeeding outcomes with surgical treatment. Standardisation of care and improved patient counselling may improve patient experience and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.