ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Neurophysiological assessment of biometric patterns during semi-immersive and traditional learning experiences in the humanities.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are you afraid? Neurophysiological responses to multidimensional fear in an interactive semi-immersive environment.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of immersive technologies in education has shown an improvement in the learning process of students. However, applications of these technologies in the Humanities are limited, since most studies focus on scientific fields. In this study, the Neurohumanities Lab was introduced as a semi-immersive space for teaching the Humanities. Two groups of 12 participants each performed activities under the semi-immersive and traditional classroom set-ups, while recording their physiological signals (electroencephalography, electrodermal activity, and heart rate). In both groups, the ITC-SOPI presence questionnaire was used to compare their differences in perceived presence levels, which showed a higher level in the experimental group. Machine learning algorithms were applied, concluding that the decision tree supervised learning model determined the most relevant features to distinguish between both set-ups with an accuracy of 90%. In the experimental group, an increased heart rate was observed with respect to the control group, while the electrodermal activity increased its peaks in both groups compared to the basal state. Additionally, brain source localization techniques revealed a notorious activation of brain areas related to emotional and somatosensory processing during the semi-immersive experience. Therefore, the Neurohumanities Lab has the potential to be a fully immersive environment for innovative education and enhanced learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.