Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710201›Full record

ArticleChemical science2026

How to evaluate aromaticity under pressure? Benzene as a benchmark system.

Jochen Eeckhoudt, Alexander Dellwisch, Annelene Plump, Felix Zeller, Tim Neudecker, Frank De Proft, Mercedes Alonso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jochen EeckhoudtVrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 Brussels Belgium mercedes.alonso.giner(at)vub.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-5604
Alexander DellwischUniversity of Bremen, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Leobener Str. 6 D-28359 Bremen Germany neudecker(at)uni-bremen.de.
Annelene PlumpUniversity of Bremen, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Leobener Str. 6 D-28359 Bremen Germany neudecker(at)uni-bremen.de.
Felix ZellerUniversity of Bremen, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Leobener Str. 6 D-28359 Bremen Germany neudecker(at)uni-bremen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9140-8359
Tim NeudeckerUniversity of Bremen, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Leobener Str. 6 D-28359 Bremen Germany neudecker(at)uni-bremen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-3578
Frank De ProftVrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 Brussels Belgium mercedes.alonso.giner(at)vub.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-7513
Mercedes AlonsoVrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 Brussels Belgium mercedes.alonso.giner(at)vub.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7076-2305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aromaticity is a fundamental concept in chemistry, central to understanding chemical stability, reactivity, and electronic structure. While traditionally examined under ambient conditions, recent studies have begun to probe its behavior in unconventional regimes, reflecting the diversification of reaction environments. Here, we investigate aromaticity under hydrostatic pressure, extending the range of external perturbations considered so far in aromaticity research. Using state-of-the-art quantum chemical methodologies designed to simulate pressure at the single-molecule level, we systematically analyze the evolution of aromaticity in benzene, the prototypical aromatic compound. Structural and electronic indices consistently indicate a modest loss of aromaticity under pressure, while magnetic descriptors point towards an enhanced aromaticity under pressure. This underscores the enduring need for a multidimensional framework consisting of complementary descriptors. During the analysis, particular emphasis is placed on the performance, adaptability, and limitations of widely used aromaticity indices under compression, leading to proposed refinements and guidelines for their reliable application. The results are interpreted within different theoretical perspectives on aromaticity, providing new insights into the robustness of aromaticity descriptors under extreme conditions and outlining avenues for future research.

Identifiers

PMID41710201
PMCPMC12912198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.