ArticleChemical science2026
How to evaluate aromaticity under pressure? Benzene as a benchmark system.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aromaticity is a fundamental concept in chemistry, central to understanding chemical stability, reactivity, and electronic structure. While traditionally examined under ambient conditions, recent studies have begun to probe its behavior in unconventional regimes, reflecting the diversification of reaction environments. Here, we investigate aromaticity under hydrostatic pressure, extending the range of external perturbations considered so far in aromaticity research. Using state-of-the-art quantum chemical methodologies designed to simulate pressure at the single-molecule level, we systematically analyze the evolution of aromaticity in benzene, the prototypical aromatic compound. Structural and electronic indices consistently indicate a modest loss of aromaticity under pressure, while magnetic descriptors point towards an enhanced aromaticity under pressure. This underscores the enduring need for a multidimensional framework consisting of complementary descriptors. During the analysis, particular emphasis is placed on the performance, adaptability, and limitations of widely used aromaticity indices under compression, leading to proposed refinements and guidelines for their reliable application. The results are interpreted within different theoretical perspectives on aromaticity, providing new insights into the robustness of aromaticity descriptors under extreme conditions and outlining avenues for future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.