Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710184›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Reimagining Recruitment and Retention in Academic Plastic Surgery.

Patrick Harbour, Aleksandra Krajewski, Ibrahim Amjad, Rajiv Chandawarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick HarbourFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Aleksandra KrajewskiDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Health Sciences Center Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY.
Ibrahim AmjadPrivate Practice, Miami, FL.
Rajiv ChandawarkarFrom the Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recruitment and retention of academic surgeons is challenging. Decreased academic support and high clinical loads cause recruits to leave within 2 years. Here, we explore creative ways to manage top talent in academic practices. Methods: A scoping review of scholarly databases and business literature was performed, and the cumulative experience of the authors was incorporated. Results: New academic recruits feel the gap between their expectations and their actual experience. Despite known advantages of academics over private practice, including resident coverage, salary support, malpractice coverage, and professional advancement opportunities, the dwindling finances in academics have forced departments to use clinical revenues to fund their academic missions. Compensation plans are now more heavily linked to clinical productivity thresholds, often at the cost of academic goals. Additionally, institutions offer limited support for practice-building, and academic promotion criteria have not adapted to the clinical demands. Finally, these pressures have transformed academic practices into becoming fiercely competitive and noncollaborative. To prevent an exodus of new recruits from academic practices, retention strategies need to change. Individual goals must be respected and aligned with the success of all 3 groups: individual, the team, and the organization. Strong practice-building tools need to be developed for new recruits to create a collaborative culture. Fair compensation must include academic metrics, and a new, creative rewards plan that improves faculty experience is vital. Conclusions: Recruitment and retention are critical elements of academic plastic surgery, and redesigning strategies to keep and grow high-value faculty will ensure the growth and advancement of the field.

Identifiers

PMID41710184
PMCPMC12912083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.