ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes After Laser-assisted Liposuction for Gynecomastia.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Statistical Reporting in Plastic Surgery Research.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional surgical treatment for gynecomastia has multiple complications. Recently, energy-based therapies have gained popularity over conventional surgical treatments, including liposuction using radiofrequency energy, power-assisted liposuction, ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and laser-assisted lipolysis (LAL). This work aims to assess LAL efficacy and glandular tissue treatment using a 1470-nm laser for gynecomastia to correct breast volume, flaccidity, and skin tightening without its removal. Methods: This prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 30 patients enrolled in the National Institute of Laser Enhanced Sciences outpatient clinic who had gynecomastia classified according to the Simon standard. The participants were randomly allocated to 2 groups: group 1 (n = 15) received conventional liposuction (suction-assisted liposuction), and group 2 received LAL (1470-nm diode laser) treatment. Patients were assessed using the BREAST-Q scale. Results: All patients achieved satisfactory results. The BREAST-Q scores were significantly higher in group 2 compared with group I ( Conclusions: The LAL described is safe and reproducible. It showed a higher BREAST-Q value, a significantly better aesthetic outcome, and fewer postoperative complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.