ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Pattern of Uveitis in a Secondary Eye Care Center at Panipat, Haryana.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uveitis pattern varies according to regional, demographic, and racial factors. Therefore, an epidemiological study of the distribution of uveitis in various regions in India is likely to provide valuable information. There is no study available on the pattern of uveitis from Haryana. Aim: To report the pattern of uveitis in a secondary eye care center in Panipat, Haryana. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 65,126 new patients who attended the Ophthalmology outpatient department of a secondary eye care hospital in Panipat from April 2015 to October 2023. The data of all the subjects is taken from electronic medical records analyzed. Results: Minimum age of the patients was 8 years, the maximum was 95 years and the mean age was 42.28 years. Out of 65,126 cases, 377 were found to have uveitis. The cumulative incidence proportion of uveitis among new patients attending our institute during the study period was 0.58%. The majority of patients were of anterior uveitis 158 (41.8%) and the minimum belonged to intermediate uveitis 39 (10.3%). It was also seen that the maximum cases were unilateral. Tailored laboratory investigations were done in all the cases. The most common cause was found to be idiopathic. Conclusion: Anterior uveitis is the most common entity in secondary care and the most common etiology found to be idiopathic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.