ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Bench Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure Control with Clinical Assessment of Anterior Chamber Stability of a Dual Peristaltic Phacoemulsification Device.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06071104 (Next Generation Cataract Surgery Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Next Generation Cataract Surgery Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To demonstrate intraocular pressure (IOP) control using the UNITY Patients and Methods: Bench testing using an eye model and calibrated pressure sensor measured IOP control error by evaluating the pressure difference between the IOP setpoint and the measured IOP under continuous irrigation for approximately 10 seconds followed by aspiration for approximately 15 seconds. To examine the system at its limits, 30 phacoemulsification (phaco) handpieces were tested at 20 mmHg IOP and 60 cc/min aspiration flow rate, and 15 irrigation/aspiration (I/A) handpieces were tested at 20 mmHg IOP and 30 cc/min aspiration flow rate. In addition, a prospective, single-arm clinical study evaluated the safety and performance of UVCS in adults presenting for routine cataract surgery (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06071104, Registered October 2, 2023). Results: The expected IOP variation at an IOP setpoint of 20 mmHg was 2.36 ± 2.13 at an aspiration flow rate of 60 cc/min during phaco and 4.19 ± 1.97 mmHg at an aspiration flow rate of 30 cc/min during I/A. These results compare favorably to physiologic IOP diurnal variation in normal patients (5.0 ± 2.7 mmHg) and demonstrate that IOP would be expected to be maintained approximately within 18 to 22 mmHg when the IOP is set to 20 mmHg during the phacoemulsification step. This is supported by results from the clinical study where 68 subjects underwent cataract surgery using UVCS, with exceptional anterior chamber stability observed during all cases. Conclusion: UNITY VCS/CS demonstrates excellent IOP control in bench testing and was reported to provide exceptional AC stability clinically. Maintaining IOP at the desired surgeon setpoint with minimal fluctuation throughout surgery may reduce intraoperative and postoperative complications, especially in more complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.