Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Evaluation of the myogenic effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation at near therapeutic amplitudes.

Carmen Toth, Brett A Campbell, Leonardo Favi Bocca, Kyle Baker, Olivia Hogue, Jakov Tiefenbach, Jeffrey Negrey, David Cunningham, André G Machado, Kenneth B Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Motor evoked potentials as markers of internal capsule current spread during deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carmen TothDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Brett A CampbellDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Leonardo Favi BoccaCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Kyle BakerDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Olivia HogueCenter for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Jakov TiefenbachDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Jeffrey NegreyDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
David CunninghamDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
André G MachadoDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Kenneth B BakerDepartment of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a standard-of-care (SoC) treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD); however, how therapeutic DBS influences motor output is incompletely understood. Specifically, the extent of electromyographic (EMG) modulation during DBS at therapeutic (or SoC) amplitude and its relationship to activity state could be better characterized. Methods: We studied the effects of DBS on muscle activity in sixteen participants receiving STN-DBS (in 17 stimulated hemispheres) by recording EMG activity in bilateral biceps, triceps, flexor carpi radialis, and extensor digitorum communis muscles. Data was acquired in the resting state and while participants alternated between isometric contraction and brief relaxation. We recorded EMG activity during low-frequency stimulation at participant-specific therapeutic amplitude and during stimulation using pulse amplitudes slightly above (125%) and below (75%) this level. Stimulus-locked responses from each condition were evaluated for the presence of a myogenic evoked potential. Results: DBS at therapeutic amplitude elicited a myogenic response almost exclusively in the contralateral upper extremity (CUE), with at least one response occurring in 16 out of 17 hemispheres. Myogenic responses, which typically started between 10-30 milliseconds and often lasted until ~70-150 milliseconds post-stimulation, were more common in biceps/triceps. Responses were more prevalent during active contraction compared to relax/rest states as stimulation amplitude increased. Discussion: These findings support that STN-DBS-induced myogenic activity is commonplace at therapeutic stimulation amplitudes used clinically; thus, studies evaluating the degree to which myogenic effects during SoC STN DBS are associated with the clinical and side effects of STN DBS therapy are warranted.

Indexed as

deep brain stimulation (DBS)motor evoked potential (MEP)Parkinson ‘s diseasestandard of care (SOC)subthalamic nucleus (STN)

Identifiers

PMID41710158
PMCPMC12910608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.