Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710111›Full record

ArticleJournal of educational and behavioral statistics : a quarterly publication sponsored by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association2025

Three-part random effect models for longitudinal skewed survey data with "not applicable" responses.

Eugenia Buta, Patricia Simon, Ralitza Gueorguieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of educational and behavioral statistics : a quarterly publication sponsored by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eugenia ButaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Patricia SimonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Ralitza GueorguievaDepartments of Biostatistics and Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Center for the Study of Tobacco Product Use and Addiction (YCSTP) Project 2: Addictive Threshold of Nicotine and the Impact of SweetenersU54DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SUCHITRA KRISHNAN-SARIN · 2018 to 2026
$41.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In survey data some questions are asked only of a subset of applicable participants. This frequently occurs together with floor effects of the provided responses. For example, in the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey, nicotine dependence is assessed only for a sub-sample of individuals at each occasion and when assessed often has value at the lower end of the scale. To capture trends over time in an unbiased and efficient way, it is important to jointly model the probabilities of being asked the questions of interest, of giving a response at the lower end of the scale and of the mean response when above the lower end of the scale. We propose a three-part model for such data which consists of two logistic sub-models and a truncated normal model. Correlations among repeated observations on the same individual are induced by random effects. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference is performed in SAS PROC NLMIXED. The PATH data on young adults are used for illustration. A simulation study investigates bias and efficiency of the three-part model compared to simpler models. The three-part model has much lower bias and better coverage probabilities for the regression coefficients than simpler models.

Indexed as

correlated random effectsjoint modeling“not applicable” responsesthree part models

Identifiers

PMID41710111
PMCPMC12912802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.