Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710106›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Machine learning and deep learning applied to EEG and fNIRS for early autism spectrum disorder diagnosis: a systematic review.

Andrea De Giacomo, Roberta Palmieri, Emanuele Francesco Russo, Ilaria Pizzolorusso, Roberta Brandi, Francesca Magistro, Michele Giuseppe Di Cesare, Sara Quattrocelli, Daniela Cardone, David Perpetuini and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrea De GiacomoDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences (DiBraiN), University Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Roberta PalmieriChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Mental Health, ASL Local Health Authority (ASL), Foggia, Italy.
Emanuele Francesco RussoPadre Pio Foundation and Rehabilitation Centers, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy.
Ilaria PizzolorussoChild and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Mental Health, ASL Local Health Authority (ASL), Foggia, Italy.
Roberta BrandiDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences (DiBraiN), University Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Francesca MagistroDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences (DiBraiN), University Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Michele Giuseppe Di CesareDepartment of Engineering and Geology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
Sara QuattrocelliDepartment of Engineering and Geology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
Daniela CardoneDepartment of Engineering and Geology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
David PerpetuiniDepartment of Engineering and Geology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
Arcangelo MerlaDepartment of Engineering and Geology, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents considerable diagnostic challenges due to its heterogeneous nature and early developmental onset. In recent years, the convergence of noninvasive neuroimaging modalities such as Electroencephalography (EEG) and Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques has opened new avenues for uncovering objective biomarkers of ASD. EEG offers millisecond level resolution of brain electrical activity, while fNIRS tracks hemodynamic responses tied to neuronal function, making the two methods complementary. This review aims to investigate the state of the art of the applications of EEG and fNIRS to ASD patients combined with ML and DL approaches. Methods: To this goal, Scopus and PubMed databases were searched, and following the PRISMA guidelines, 27 peer reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2024 were included in the survey. Results: The results showed consistent patterns across the studies, including alterations in neural oscillations and disruptions in connectivity within key brain regions related to social communication and cognition. However, a strong heterogeneity was assessed regarding probes montages, preprocessing workflows, and classification models employed, limiting the feasibility of a metanalysis. Discussion: The results demonstrated the potential of DL and ML algorithms applied to EEG and fNIRS signals for early ASD assessment, supporting the development of personalized intervention strategies grounded in robust neurophysiological evidence.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderdeep learningEEGfNIRSmachine learningneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID41710106
PMCPMC12909569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.