Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710078›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Our stories matter: a mixed methods survey of lived and living experience perspectives of media and public communication of suicide in Australia.

Emma Pryse Jones, Elizabeth Paton, Megan Barrow, Jon Eddy, Jennifer Peprah, Jose Cuenca, Jaelea Skehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma Pryse JonesEverymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth PatonEverymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-4862
Megan BarrowEverymind Lived Experience Advisory Group, Everymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Jon EddyEverymind Lived Experience Advisory Group, Everymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer PeprahEverymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Jose CuencaEverymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Jaelea SkehanEverymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suicide is a major global public health issue, yet the voices of people who have a lived and living experience of suicide are often left out of public discussion about suicide. Media plays a critical role in shaping perception and community discourse, with much of the current work to develop media guidelines focused on reducing suicide risk. Despite the known benefits of sharing lived and living experience stories of hope, recovery and coping with suicidality (the Papageno effect), guidelines on safe and effective storytelling remain limited. This study aimed to (1) understand how people with lived and living experience of suicide engage with and perceive media representations of suicide; (2) identify essential considerations for safe storytelling; and (3) understand best practices for media and communication professionals supporting lived or living experience storytellers. To meet these aims, people with lived and living experience were included across all aspects of the project, including as authors on this paper. Methods: A mixed method survey (with both quantitative and qualitative components) of people with a lived and living experience of suicide was distributed in Australia using a purposive, non-probability convenience sampling method. Participants answered questions about developing guidelines for safely sharing personal stories of suicide by drawing on their experiences of engaging in content relating to suicide on news media and other public communication platforms (part 1 of survey). In addition, participants who had direct experience sharing their story publicly were asked additional questions (part 2 of survey). Results: A total of 309 participants engaged with part 1 of the survey, with 125 continuing to complete part 2. Findings indicated significant gaps in mainstream media representation, with 75% identifying that their lived experience is not represented in the media, with only bereaved participants reporting representation. Further, 79% believe media does not recognise diversity in experiences of suicide. Results from part 2 participants indicated key considerations for storytelling included: before sharing, having clarity on purpose (81.3%), differentiating meaningful from tokenistic opportunities (80.5%) and self-care planning (77.1%); during sharing, careful language use (81.2%) and consent when involving others' experiences (81.2%); and after sharing, preparation for distress contacts (82.4%) and boundary maintenance (74.8%). Notably, 40.9% of participants experienced burnout from public storytelling, with boundary-setting, adequate rest and organisational support identified as essential protective factors. Conclusions: The results suggest opportunities for media to increase and diversify public narratives of suicide to include stories of hope and survival, in addition to existing narratives of bereavement. They also suggest essential supports for storytellers must include improved protocols for preventing burnout. These findings informed the development of Australia's first comprehensive guidelines for sharing personal experiences of suicide safely, and guidance for media and public communication professionals supporting advocates and lived and living experience spokespeople (Our stories matter, 2024). This addresses a critical gap in suicide prevention practice.

Indexed as

CommunicationEducationMental HealthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID41710078
PMCPMC12911772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.