Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41710070›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Identifying subgroups of frequent emergency department users: a latent class analysis with linked healthcare utilisation, cost and mortality outcomes in the UK.

Richard Mattock, Chris Bojke, Samuel D Relton, Akshay Kumar, Chris Burton, Suzanne Mason, Sonia Saraiva, Robert West, William Lee, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Richard MattockLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-5233
Chris BojkeLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Samuel D ReltonLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Akshay KumarLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Chris BurtonSchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Suzanne MasonSchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sonia SaraivaLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Robert WestLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
William LeeCornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK.
Christina van der Feltz-CornelisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Catriona MarshallLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Gerlinde PilkingtonSchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Steven ArissSchool of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Steven DykesYorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.
Elspeth GuthrieLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frequent users (FUs) of emergency departments (EDs) attend repeatedly, placing a disproportionate burden on healthcare systems. Although known to be heterogeneous, there is limited international evidence characterising FU subpopulations or examining how healthcare costs and outcomes differ across groups. Advancing this understanding is important for developing tailored interventions to meet diverse care needs. Methods: FUs were defined as individuals with ≥5 ED attendances/year. We used two large UK datasets: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES, 2016-2019) and the Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care database (CUREd, 2017-2020). Together, these included over 148 000 FUs from 5 million ED users. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify FU subgroups based on attendance patterns, healthcare use and diagnostic characteristics. Results: We identified three consistent subgroups (HES and CUREd): (1) low-severity FUs (n=23 034, 43.2%; n=7081, 32.7%); (2) high-intensity FUs with mental health and neurological needs (n=6288, 11.8%; n=3456, 15.9%); (3) older FUs with chronic illness and high inpatient use (n=24 028, 45.0%; n=11 139, 51.4%). Subgroups differed substantially in healthcare utilisation, costs and mortality. A fourth class varied across datasets: in HES, it showed moderate morbidity and complex needs; in CUREd, high morbidity and high-intensity ED use. Discussion: This is the first FU study to apply LCA across large-scale, multiyear ED datasets, identifying a potentially universal subgroup structure. Current services focus on a narrow subset of high-intensity users. Additional tailored strategies are needed to address the full spectrum of FU needs.

Indexed as

AccidentsEmergenciesMental HealthPublic Healthstatistics and numerical data

Identifiers

PMID41710070
PMCPMC12911696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.