ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2026
Usability and stability of longitudinal at-home sleep evaluation using the Waveband electroencephalogram headband in an insomnia population.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objectives: Sleep monitoring outside of clinics could enhance care for insomnia and other sleep disorders but requires home systems that are easily operable and provide consistent data quality over multiple nights. We assessed the Waveband for usability by participants and feasibility of obtaining multi-night sleep data in the home setting. Methods: 15 subjects with insomnia wore the Waveband electroencephalogram headband and an FDA-cleared wearable home sleep testing device, WatchPAT ONE ("WP1") for three nights. Usability was assessed via the System Usability Scale (SUS). Feasibility of participants to collect data was evaluated by examining stability of measured total sleep time in relation to measurements from the reference device (WP1) and data quality as evaluated by three human experts. Results: Average SUS score was 69.7, meeting the 68-point threshold for good usability. Total sleep time recorded by the Waveband and WP1 devices showed a correlation of 87.3 per cent. All the recordings had an average of over 7 scorable hours of data per night. Conclusions: Waveband demonstrated good usability by patients, was operable by patients, and generated interpretable data that provided stable sleep estimates across nights, comparable to an established home sleep testing device. The device has potential to advance patient care, sleep research, and clinical trials by enabling longitudinal ambulatory sleep assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.