ArticleNeurophotonics2026
Optimizing short-channel regression in fNIRS: an empirical evaluation with ecological audiovisual stimuli.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CW-fDOT with a standard optical brain model: improving hemodynamic sensitivity and functional localization.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is increasingly favored for its portability and suitability for ecological paradigms, yet methodological standardization remains a challenge regarding the optimal use of short-separation channels (SC) to remove systemic physiological noise. Aim: We aim to evaluate and compare methods of SC regression as implemented in the most widely used fNIRS analysis toolboxes, with the goal of reaching a consensus on best practices for incorporating SC into generalized linear model (GLM)-based analyses. Specifically, we compared ten SC regression strategies addressing SC selectivity, dimensionality reduction strategies, and SC availability. Approach: Sixteen healthy adults passively listened and watched ecological auditory, visual, and audiovisual stimuli, whereas occipital and bilateral auditory cortices were recorded. Results: Oxygenated hemoglobin signals (HbO) processed without SC regression produced uninterpretable results in the context of the present study. Nonselective SC regression methods that pooled all available SC signals consistently outperformed anatomically or functionally restricted approaches. Orthogonalization further enhanced performance by reducing redundancy and capturing shared systemic variance, improving detection of stimulus-specific cortical responses and contrast sensitivity. Deoxygenated hemoglobin signals (HbR), whereas less sensitive to systemic artifacts than HbO, benefited most, similarly to HbO, from the pooled, orthogonalized SC signal approach. Conclusion: Overall, our findings highlight the essential role of SC regression in recovering physiologically meaningful signals in fNIRS and recommend including all available SC channels within the GLM, coupled with orthogonalization techniques, as a generalizable best practice for denoising across hardware configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.