ReviewCureus2026
Integrating Planetary Health Into Interprofessional Education: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Planetary health underscores the relationship between human well-being and the environment. It focuses on how climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss affect people's health. Integrating this concept into interprofessional education (IPE) is vital for preparing health professionals to address these issues. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on IPE initiatives in planetary health, examine outcomes, and identify research gaps. It also aimed to inform educators, policymakers, and researchers about effective strategies and areas that require further investigation. Following established scoping review methodology, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases using specified search terms. Studies from 2019 to 2024 were included, reflecting recent developments in IPE on planetary health. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction, with conflicts resolved through discussion. A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria, showcasing diverse educational approaches across medical education, public health, and nursing. The review identified varying levels of curriculum integration, impacts on knowledge and confidence, and challenges such as a lack of standardization, resource limitations, and barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings were categorized by discipline, methodology, country of origin, and educational focus, providing insights into the evolving landscape of health professional education in response to planetary health challenges. The synthesis demonstrates the importance of integrating planetary health into health professional curricula to effectively address global environmental changes. Key findings illustrate the diversity of educational approaches and underscore the need for standardized frameworks, effective resource allocation, and enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration to strengthen educational initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.