ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Comparative Efficacy of Coral Calcium Carried Hydrogen versus Dexamethasone in a Mouse Model of Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common T cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity reaction characterized by chronic skin inflammation. Coral calcium carried hydrogen (CCH), a novel solid-phase hydrogen carrier, enables sustained hydrogen release and demonstrates superior stability compared to conventional hydrogen delivery methods. However, its therapeutic potential in ACD remains unexplored. Methods: ACD was induced in female BALB/c mice (8-week-old) using 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). Mice were divided into four groups: Control, DNCB model, CCH-treated (oral CCH), and dexamethasone (DEX)-treated (oral DEX). Disease severity was assessed through dermatitis scores, scratching frequency, spleen coefficient, and histopathological analysis. Serum cytokine levels and peripheral blood immune cell profiles were evaluated to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Results: CCH treatment significantly ameliorated ACD symptoms, comparable to DEX, as evidenced by reduced dermatitis scores, scratching behavior, and spleen enlargement. Histologically, CCH promoted ulcer healing and more effectively suppressed epidermal hyperplasia and skin inflammation than DEX. Mechanistically, CCH selectively reduced serum IgE and IL-17 levels while decreasing lymphocyte counts and proportions. In contrast, DEX primarily inhibited monocytes and neutrophils. Conclusion: CCH exerts its therapeutic effects by modulating lymphocyte-mediated immune responses and suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines, offering a promising therapeutic alternative with efficacy comparable to glucocorticoids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.