ReviewYonago acta medica2026
Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence for ADME Prediction in Drug Discovery: From Small Molecules to Biologics.
Review in Yonago acta medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning for Accelerated Drug Discovery: Opportunities and Unmet Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Development of Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior, which emerges from the underlying processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME), is central to drug discovery and development, dose optimization, and safety assessment. Despite decades of experimental and computational research, early-stage prediction of human PK remains a major challenge, contributing to clinical attrition and inefficiency in pharmaceutical pipelines. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have significantly improved ADME predictions, particularly for small molecules. Traditional descriptor-based quantitative structure-activity relationship and classical ML methods offer interpretability and robust performance on standardized datasets. In contrast, graph neural networks, deep learning architectures, and chemical language models facilitate the learning of complex nonlinear structure-property relationships and multitask predictions. Multimodal frameworks further integrate experimental measurements, structural data, and biological contexts, enhancing predictive accuracy under low-data and heterogeneous conditions. Emerging modalities, including peptides, oligonucleotides, and antibody-based therapeutics, pose additional challenges owing to their sequence-dependent stability, conformational flexibility, and mechanistically distinct determinants of ADME and toxicity (ADMET). AI approaches that incorporate sequence-, structure-, and mechanism-aware representations combined with multimodal data integration have demonstrated improved predictability for medium- and large-molecule therapeutics. Recent developments in foundation-model architectures offer unified representations across chemical, biological, and biophysical domains, enabling cross-modality ADMET modeling with enhanced generalization and mechanistic interpretability. In this review, we summarize the evolution of computational ADME- and PK-oriented prediction frameworks from small molecules to complex biologics, highlighting methodological advances, representative studies, and emerging trends in multimodal and foundation-model approaches. We also discuss the limitations and future perspectives of the practical implementation of AI-driven ADMET predictions to support rational drug design and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.