ArticleYonago acta medica2026
Association of Labor Epidural Analgesia with Neonatal Umbilical Arterial Blood pH and Apgar Score: The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).
Article in Yonago acta medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dural Puncture Epidural, Standard Epidural, and No Epidural: Comparative Effects on Labor Progression and Neonatal Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Labor epidural analgesia is recognized worldwide as the gold standard for maternal pain relief during delivery and has been increasingly used in Japan. However, studies on labor analgesia in Japan are scarce, and evaluation of neonatal outcomes associated with this procedure remains limited. Among the key aspects in the safety evaluation of labor epidural analgesia are the potential effects on neonatal umbilical arterial blood pH (UmA-pH) and Apgar score. Therefore, we determined whether labor epidural analgesia during vaginal delivery is associated with neonatal UmA-pH and Apgar score among women delivering in Japan. Methods: In this birth cohort study, we prospectively analyzed data collected from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS). We included Japanese pregnant women who had singleton vaginal deliveries. The primary exposure was labor epidural analgesia, and the primary outcomes were UmA-pH and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min following birth. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the associations between labor epidural analgesia and neonatal outcomes, with adjustment for potential confounders. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted. Results: Of the 96,443 women who had singleton deliveries in the JECS, 55,227 were included in the final analysis, 1,311 (2.4%) of whom received labor epidural analgesia. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant association was observed between labor epidural analgesia and a 1-min Apgar score < 7 (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.03-2.29). However, only one neonate in the labor epidural analgesia group had a 5-min Apgar score < 7. Moreover, no significant association was observed between labor epidural analgesia and UmA-pH < 7.2 (aOR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76-1.17). In the IPTW-based sensitivity analysis, the effect estimates were consistent in direction with the primary analysis, supporting the robustness of the main findings. Conclusion: In this large cohort of singleton vaginal births in Japan, the use of labor epidural analgesia had little to no clinically meaningful effect on neonatal outcomes, including UmA-pH < 7.2 and Apgar score < 7. These findings support informed decision-making for pregnant women in Japan who are considering labor epidural analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.