Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709923›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Saccade reaction test for the assessment of cognitive readiness.

Jun Maruta, Jamshid Ghajar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun MarutaDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Jamshid GhajarBrain Trauma Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive performance such as rapidly reacting to a target or making correct decisions can directly impact task effectiveness in military, emergency, or athletic settings. Saccades are rapid changes in gaze that support recognition and analysis of objects of potential interest in human vision whose acuity rapidly degrades away from the center. The saccade behavior is highly selective and controlled and thus is an expression of attention. We implemented a two-dimensional reactive saccade task to quantify attention performance. Methods: We studied a sample of 169 healthy individuals aged 8-82 years old (39% male), 37 of whom were retested 1-3 months later. Subjects viewed a target presented in a randomized spatiotemporal sequence, and associated timings of saccade initiation and gaze arrival were registered. Individuals' performance was characterized with the mean and standard deviation of the reciprocals of these measures (1/time, postulated to represent the cortical decision speed). Results: The intraclass correlation between the test and retest measures varied from 0.60 to 0.74. The reaction speed showed a tendency to become faster and less variable during development in childhood through young adulthood and thereafter become slower and more variable, with best performance tending to be seen in the 20s. Conclusion: We verified inter-individual variability, within-individual stability, and across-age differences in the performance on a reactive saccade task. A quick assessment of attentional traits or states with saccade reaction metrics, aided by rapidly developing technology, may provide utility in a cognitive readiness test that can inform task assignment or return-to-duty/play decisions.

Indexed as

attentional signaturesbrain healthcognitive profilingeye movementfoveal visionoculomotorperformance variabilityvideo-oculography

Identifiers

PMID41709923
PMCPMC12909179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.