ArticleFrontiers in neurology
A survey about laughter upon viewing functional seizures.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laughter among physicians when observing clinical manifestations of functional seizures (FS) or other functional disorders is frequently noted. This reflexive response can occur both in clinical practice and during video presentations at medical conferences. We examine the underlying factors contributing to physicians' laughter in response to the diagnosis of FS. Methods: The research, spanning 5 years and diverse geographical locations, surveyed 221 participants, including physicians and non-physicians, to understand the reasons behind laughter during FS diagnoses. Results: A total of 221 respondents (estimated 20-25% of attendees) completed the survey, with 56% identifying as physicians and 44% as non-physicians. Observational data showed laughter responses to FS videos varied widely across settings: approximately 57% at U. S. medical grand rounds, compared to 5-17% at international conferences, and 0% among non-medical audiences. Survey analysis revealed 10 thematic categories for reasons behind laughter, with significant differences between physicians and non-physicians. Non-physicians more frequently cited defense mechanisms, negative opinions, and ignorance, whereas physicians more often attributed laughter to superiority, diagnostic skepticism, or perceived patient deception. U. S. physicians were significantly more likely than non-U. S. physicians to report discomfort, negative opinions, and ignorance. No significant differences were found between neurologists and internists. Significance: Laughter may serve multifaceted adaptive functions in response to the complexities of diagnosing and managing patients with FS. By highlighting misperceptions surrounding functional disorders, the study underscores the importance of fostering a deeper understanding among clinicians to ensure equitable care for patients experiencing FS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.