SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy and safety of probiotic/synbiotic supplementation for osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the Gut-Bone Axis with Prebiotics, Probiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics: From Mechanistic Plausibility to Clinical Bone Outcomes.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Gut Microbial Metabolites as a Bridge in Osteoporotic Rehabilitation for the Elderly: From Aging-Related Dysbiosis to Precision Non-Pharmacological Strategies.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotic/synbiotic supplementation for osteoporosis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used to screen studies up to October 2025. Data pooling used standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analysis assessed result stability. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 15.1 were used to analyze. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test and funnel plots. Evidence for each outcome was evaluated and graded according to GRADE. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 732 patients were included. Significant improvements in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) (SMD: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.01, 1.69; Conclusion: Probiotic/synbiotic supplementation may be safe and effective as an adjunctive treatment for osteoporosis, improving bone density without increasing adverse reactions. Larger, multicenter RCTs are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024540614, identifier CRD42024540614.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.