ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Diagnostic challenges of giant cervical pilomatrixoma mimicking malignancy: case report and focused literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilomatrixoma is a benign skin adnexal tumor arising from the hair-follicle matrix. While typically small and slowly growing, rare "giant" variants (>5 cm)-especially in the cervical region-may clinically and radiologically mimic malignant masses, posing a significant diagnostic challenge. We report a case of a 29-year-old male presenting with a solitary, firm, subcutaneous mass (~6 cm) in the left anterior cervical region, which enlarged rapidly over 6 months without pain or systemic symptoms. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a well-defined, heterogeneous subcutaneous lesion without muscular or vascular invasion. Core needle biopsy (CNB) supported a diagnosis of pilomatrixoma. The mass was completely excised under IV sedation and local anesthesia. Histopathology confirmed classic pilomatrixoma features (basaloid cells, shadow cells, foreign-body giant cell reaction). At one-year follow-up the patient was disease-free, and scar outcome was excellent. This case underscores the importance of including giant pilomatrixoma in the differential diagnosis of large cervical soft-tissue masses. Histopathological examination remains essential for definitive diagnosis, while CNB can guide preoperative planning. Complete surgical excision yields excellent outcomes with minimal morbidity, avoiding overtreatment for suspected malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.