Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709883›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Efficacy analysis of modified halo-pelvic traction combined with pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Li Li, Zhu Xu, Ma Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li LiDepartment of Spine, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China.
Zhu XuDepartment of Spine, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China.
Ma YuanDepartment of Spine, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment of severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is challenging, and traditional halo-pelvic traction (HPT) presents multiple disadvantages. This study evaluated the efficacy of modified HPT combined with Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 38 patients with severe AIS treated from January 2023 to May 2024. Sixteen patients (modified group) received modified HPT combined with PSO, and 22 patients (control group) underwent traditional HPT combined with PSO. Correction efficacy, pulmonary function, and complications were compared between groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline characteristics before treatment ( Conclusion: Both modified and traditional HPT combined with PSO are effective and safe. The modified technique may offer additional advantages in sagittal plane correction and pulmonary function improvement, representing a viable alternative treatment for severe AIS. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these potential benefits.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosisefficacyhalo-pelvic tractionosteotomy correctionspinal deformity

Identifiers

PMID41709883
PMCPMC12909520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.