ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Brain activity reveals how wildlife imagery evokes engagement on social media.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vivid images of wildlife can motivate environmental advocacy and charitable giving, yet the mechanisms that drive their broad appeal remain unclear. To investigate how wildlife images influence online behavior, we combined behavioral experiments, neuroimaging data, and large-scale social media engagement data from National Geographic's Instagram. Consistent with findings on charitable giving to humans, activity in brain circuits associated with anticipatory affect (i.e. the nucleus accumbens or NAcc) and value integration (i.e. the medial prefrontal cortex or MPFC) predicted individual liking and donations to depicted wildlife. Further, group MPFC activity forecast aggregate engagement (i.e. likes controlling for followers) with wildlife images on social media. Auxiliary analyses indicated that neural activity in circuits associated with socioemotional processing (i.e. facial salience and mentalizing) correlated with MPFC activity. In a neurally inspired model, these socioemotional features forecast social media engagement in other wildlife images online. Together, these findings imply that neural activity not only forecasts engagement with wildlife imagery on social media but can also inform theoretical models of which wildlife image features most powerfully promote sustainable behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.