ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Pseudo-Migration After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Case Series Highlighting a Novel Diagnostic Pitfall.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a validated strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to anticoagulation or who are at risk of high bleeding. LAAO device embolization is a rare but serious complication that typically occurs within the first 24 hours postprocedure. CASE SUMMARY: We report 2 cases of apparent device migration on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) after LAAO that were ultimately determined to represent pseudo-migration. In both cases, routine postprocedural TTE raised concern for device dislodgement. However, confirmatory transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography demonstrated stable device position with no peridevice leak or embolization. Both patients remained clinically stable without adverse outcomes. DISCUSSION: These cases highlight the limitations of TTE in patients with an anteriorly oriented left atrial appendage and emphasize the importance of confirmatory imaging before assuming true embolization. To our knowledge, pseudo-migration has not been previously described in the literature, and it may be an under-recognized phenomenon. Recognition of this imaging pitfall could prevent unnecessary interventions. Future directions include systematic evaluation of imaging artifacts after LAAO and establishing standardized protocols for confirming device position. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Pseudo-migration after LAAO is a newly described phenomenon caused by TTE limitations in specific appendage anatomies. Awareness of this pitfall and reliance on confirmatory imaging may prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.