Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709727›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

At the intersection of soundscapes and roads: Quantifying anthrophony's influence on wildlife crossing structure use.

Thomas J Yamashita, Ashley M Tanner, Evan P Tanner, Daniel G Scognamillo, Michael E Tewes, John H Young, Jason V Lombardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. At the intersection of soundscapes and roads: Quantifying anthrophony's influence on wildlife crossing structure use.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas J YamashitaCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-6310
Ashley M TannerCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-5196
Evan P TannerCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-7004
Daniel G ScognamilloCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.
Michael E TewesCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.
John H YoungEnvironmental Affairs Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, USA.
Jason V LombardiCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.

Funding

Texas Department of Transportation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise (anthrophony) can have significant negative effects on wildlife, causing both physiological (i.e., increased stress hormone production) and behavioral (i.e., altered anti-predator behaviors, space use, or diel activity) changes in individuals. Roads are a major source of anthrophony, often contributing the most to the anthrophony in rural areas. Most efforts to reduce road effects on wildlife have focused on decreasing road-associated mortality through the construction of wildlife crossing structures (WCSs) with little consideration for the anthrophony associated with these structures. Given the impacts of anthrophony on wildlife behavior, the effectiveness of WCSs could be altered without consideration of noise pollution. Therefore, understanding how anthrophony is structured in space and time and how it impacts WCS use is an important aspect of assessing the effectiveness of WCSs. We developed a framework for assessing anthrophony at WCS using an array of autonomous recording units to monitor overall acoustic conditions. We then examined how wildlife crossing rates were associated with anthrophony using camera traps. We monitored five underpass-style WCSs built in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, USA, using camera traps and acoustic recording units. We measured sound pressure level (SPL [dB]) and relative level of anthrophony (using the normalized difference soundscape index [NDSI]) at six positions around each WCS: two at elevation (road grade) with the road surface (west and east), two at the WCS entrances, and two in the middle of the WCSs. We then used SPL and NDSI to predict the probability of a successful crossing by Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), a common, disturbance-tolerant mammal. While the relative amount of anthrophony did not differ, smaller WCSs and those with less traffic were up to 40 dB quieter than larger WCSs and those with more traffic. Opossums spent more time at WCSs when it was quieter on average and were more likely to successfully cross through a WCS when there was less vehicle noise. Our study highlights the importance of considering soundscapes in assessing WCS effectiveness and represents a framework that can be used for further exploration of the impacts of anthrophony on WCS use.

Indexed as

Animals, WildNoiseNoise, TransportationAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringTexasanthrophonynormalized difference soundscape indexroad ecologysound pressure levelVirginia opossumwildlife crossing structures

Identifiers

PMID41709727
PMCPMC12917473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.