ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Evaluating Regulatory Compliance of Drug Information and Clinical Trial Protocols.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Transcriptomics: From Human-in-the-Loop to Agentic AI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose was to evaluate retrieval-augmented generative (RAG) artificial intelligence (AI) methods for assessing the regulatory compliance of drug information and adherence to best practices in clinical trial protocols. Integrated systems containing RAG and large language model (LLM) components were employed to evaluate drug information and clinical trial protocols. The drug information for adalimumab, insulin glargine, atorvastatin calcium, sertraline, and alprazolam was evaluated for compliance with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical pharmacology guidance for indications, use in specific populations, and warnings and precautions. The reasons for the withdrawal of rofecoxib, valdecoxib, and troglitazone were elicited. The clinical trial protocol evaluation system was used to assess a Phase-2a clinical trial protocol of Rifafour in tuberculosis with the FDA E9 and E9 (R1) guidance documents. The RAG system correctly identified the indications, use in specific populations, and warnings and precautions for adalimumab, insulin glargine, atorvastatin calcium, sertraline, and alprazolam. The drug information was evaluated against the requirements in the guidance documents, confirming compliance when present and providing explanations for deficiencies. The causes underlying the withdrawal of rofecoxib, valdecoxib, and troglitazone were explained. The clinical protocol summary included study design, population definitions, treatments, dose levels, and route of administration. The summary of the statistical analysis plan included primary/secondary endpoints, statistical tests, pharmacokinetic parameters, and handling of missing data and outliers. The findings aligned with manual protocol reviews. RAG-based AI methods can improve the usefulness of LLMs in document-restricted settings and are a promising approach for evaluating the compliance of clinical pharmacology documents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.