Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709726›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Evaluating Regulatory Compliance of Drug Information and Clinical Trial Protocols.

Shreyas Waikar, Amruta Gajanan Bhat, Murali Ramanathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shreyas WaikarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3786-6025
Amruta Gajanan BhatDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5180-7790
Murali RamanathanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9943-150X

Funding

Gates Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate retrieval-augmented generative (RAG) artificial intelligence (AI) methods for assessing the regulatory compliance of drug information and adherence to best practices in clinical trial protocols. Integrated systems containing RAG and large language model (LLM) components were employed to evaluate drug information and clinical trial protocols. The drug information for adalimumab, insulin glargine, atorvastatin calcium, sertraline, and alprazolam was evaluated for compliance with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clinical pharmacology guidance for indications, use in specific populations, and warnings and precautions. The reasons for the withdrawal of rofecoxib, valdecoxib, and troglitazone were elicited. The clinical trial protocol evaluation system was used to assess a Phase-2a clinical trial protocol of Rifafour in tuberculosis with the FDA E9 and E9 (R1) guidance documents. The RAG system correctly identified the indications, use in specific populations, and warnings and precautions for adalimumab, insulin glargine, atorvastatin calcium, sertraline, and alprazolam. The drug information was evaluated against the requirements in the guidance documents, confirming compliance when present and providing explanations for deficiencies. The causes underlying the withdrawal of rofecoxib, valdecoxib, and troglitazone were explained. The clinical protocol summary included study design, population definitions, treatments, dose levels, and route of administration. The summary of the statistical analysis plan included primary/secondary endpoints, statistical tests, pharmacokinetic parameters, and handling of missing data and outliers. The findings aligned with manual protocol reviews. RAG-based AI methods can improve the usefulness of LLMs in document-restricted settings and are a promising approach for evaluating the compliance of clinical pharmacology documents.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGuideline AdherenceGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAIartificial intelligenceclinical pharmacologyLLMMIDDpharmacometricsRAG

Identifiers

PMID41709726
PMCPMC12917324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.