Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709605›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2025

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Adolescent Sleep Health Belief Scale.

Hasret Dikici, Hasibe Kadıoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hasret DikiciDepartment of Public Health Nursing, Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Hasibe KadıoğluDepartment of Nursing, Fenerbahçe University Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to develop a scale based on the Health Belief Model that can reliably and validly evaluate adolescents' beliefs toward sleep.

methodsThis study was conducted using a methodological design with 494 adolescents between September and October 2022 in Antalya, Türkiye . Eighty-one items about sleep were created according to the Health Belief Model. Validity was assessed in terms of content and construct validity, and reliability was assessed through internal consistency. Content validity was evaluated by ten expert opinions. The scale was tested for construct validity with exploratory factor analysis, after which the scale's reliability was evaluated by examining item-total correlations using Pearson's correlation analysis and assessing internal consistency with Cronbach's Alpha.

resultsItem-level content validity index scores ranged between 0.80 and 1. The scale-level content validity index value was found to be 0.94. In the exploratory factor analysis of the 46-item scale, six factors were found with an eigenvalue greater than 1, explaining 57.7% of the total variance. The scale's item total correlations ranged from 0.26 to 0.79. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales were 0.92 for perceived susceptibility, 0.90 for perceived severity, 0.90 for perceived benefits, 0.81 for self-efficacy, 0.79 for motivation, and 0.69 for perceived barriers.

conclusionThe Adolescent Sleep Health Belief Scale demonstrated good validity and reliability in adolescents. Its cross-cultural adaptation for use with adolescents in other countries is recommended.   Cite this article as: Dikici, H., & Kadıoğlu, H. (2025). Development and preliminary psychometric properties of the adolescent sleep health belief scale. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 1933, 0138, doi:10.5152/FNJN.2025.25138.

Identifiers

PMID41709605
PMCPMC12927427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.