ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2026
Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns in Contact Lens-Associated Bacteria.
Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize biofilm-forming capacity, extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), and antibiotic susceptibility (AST) of bacteria isolated from contact lenses (CL) and their accessories.
methodsBacterial isolates from 20 CLs and their cases were evaluated for biofilm formation using crystal violet (CV) staining in tube and tissue culture plate assays. AST was performed by the Kirby-Bauer method. EPS production was assessed using Congo red agar (CRA) and Congo red broth (CRB), while carbohydrate, protein, and extracellular DNA (eDNA) contents were quantified.
resultsThe bacterial isolates included Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, identified and confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Out of 110 isolates, biofilm production by CV staining showed 28.5% strongly positive, 38.1% moderately positive, and 23.3% weakly positive by the tube method, and 32.1%, 18.6%, and 29.0%, respectively by tissue culture plate method; 14.3% were non-biofilm producers. The selected isolates were susceptible to the tested antibiotics, but resistance was noted in A. xylosoxidans. The EPS production was confirmed by black coloration in CRA plates, and CRB tubes with carbohydrate content was found to increase, whereas protein content was slightly reduced, and the presence of eDNA was detected after 48 hours. The scanning electron microscopy images depicted the presence of branched and sheet-like extracellular matrix structures. Physiological conditions like acidic pH and the presence of ribose sugar showed reduced biofilm; conversely, incubation at 28 °C enhanced bacterial attachment. In Staphylococcus species, increased salt concentration supported biofilm formation.
conclusionsThis study showed that bacteria isolated from CL of asymptomatic users had significant biofilm-forming ability. A. xylosoxidans and CoNs Staphylococcus were the predominant biofilm producers. CRB was an effective qualitative method for detecting EPS. These findings indicate bacterial colonization rather than infection and highlight the importance of proper contact lens hygiene and preventive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.