Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709505›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

Rural Health Services Disruption: An Evaluation of Nursing's Professional 'Positionality'.

Jessica G Smith, Sharon Laver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica G SmithUniversity of Texas at Arlington College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arlington, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-1905
Sharon LaverSchool of Nursing, Paramedicine and Healthcare Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4956-0012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rural health services disruption poses a significant global challenge, with nurses at the forefront of its impact. From supply chain disruptions and workforce shortages to climate events and demographic shifts, these challenges consistently threaten the provision of healthcare in rural areas. In the United States, rural hospital closures exemplify the disruption of rural health services. Socio-political impasses disrupt efforts to curb rural hospital closures and appear to be rooted in networks of political ideologies and economic imperatives for profit. Nurses working in rural communities that experience a rural hospital closure are burdened with navigating disruptions and systemic barriers while simultaneously striving to fulfil their professional obligations to care for others. A bedrock for a consistent professional stance, or position statement that supports preparation for and contemporary nursing practice in rural communities, requires philosophical groundwork to define the profession's positionality in relation to rural nursing and rural nursing practice. By positioning health as a fundamental human right for rural residents, nursing as a profession holds the potential to lead systemic change for greater rural healthcare access. Grounded in the ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses, nurses globally could fulfil their social contract through advocacy for equitable access to services for rural populations. It is essential for nurses to actively engage as a professional group with rural communities to influence systemic reforms. Defining a professional nursing positionality could spark a collective move from being a casualty of disruption to igniting agency in professional responses that move beyond individualistic socio-political and economic divisions to a professional position of advocating for equity in rural healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesHealth Facility ClosureHumansUnited Statescodes of ethicshealth facility closurehuman rightspositionalityrural health servicesrural nursingsocial contract

Identifiers

PMID41709505
PMCPMC12917292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.