ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Having a Routine Source of Healthcare and Its Impact on Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendation Compliance.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low in the US. Previous research has indicated that primary care providers are trusted sources for healthcare recommendations, including cancer screening.
methodsCRC module questions within the 2022 BRFSS were reviewed and multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between healthcare engagement and likelihood of CRC screening.
resultsResults showed that those with the highest level of healthcare seeking behavior were almost 10 times as likely to receive appropriate CRC screening compared to the lowest engagement group. In a multivariable logistic regression, this relationship remained with higher healthcare engagement having an odds ratio of 5.951 compared to low engagement. DISCUSSION: This study indicates seeing a regular healthcare provider in the past year is associated with increased CRC screening. These results confirmed he role that marriage/partnership plays in cancer screening in the US which should be an intervention area considered. This study re-emphasized that there remain racial/ethnic disparities in CRC screening with almost all groups receiving less CRC screening compared to White, non-Hispanic respondents.
conclusionThis research re-emphasizes the critical role that primary care providers play in the landscape of patient care and specifically identifies these settings as key for intervening to increase uptake of CRC screening recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.