ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Second surgical treatment of recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) treatment remains a challenge in this context of functional pathology. After an initial surgical treatment, TOS may recur, and its management becomes a challenge again. We report our experience about recurrent-TOS after complete first rib resection and scalenotomy. After a new diagnostic assessment, and failure of physiotherapy, we performed a second surgical treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 32-year-old patient presented with symptoms consistent with left-sided neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS). After the failure of physiotherapy, a first rib resection with anterior and middle scalenectomy via Roos-axillary approach was performed. He initially felt an improvement, allowing him to go back to work. At 9 months, the patient had recurrent TOS with left arm pain. At 18 months, he consulted our department. The examination revealed positive dynamic manoeuvres. For an objective assessment, the patient completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH-score), and the Physical Component of Short-Form-12 score (PCS-SF12).DASH-score was 43.3 and the PCS-SF12 was 32.2. Electroneuromyogram shows a left plexus C8-T1 dysfunction. Dynamic ultrasound showed complete arteriovenous compression under the left clavicle at 30 degrees abduction. X-ray shows a complete resection of the first rib. Dynamic arteriography shows compression between the second rib and the clavicle, and a pectoralis minor compression syndrom. Our surgical management consisted of second rib resection with a posterior scalenectomy and section of the left pectoralis minor muscle, by Roos axillary approach, without complication. Dynamic manoeuvres are now negative. He no longer has paresthesia in his left hand. The DASH-score at 6 weeks is 16.6 and the PCS-SF12 is 46.5. This clinical improvement will continue throughout the first year of follow-up. The DASH-score is 1.7 at 6 months and 0.83 at 12 months. The PCS-SF12 is 51.7 at 6 months and 55.5 at 12 months.
conclusionsIn the case of recurrent TOS, a new maximalist diagnostic management should be performed to clearly identify the etiology of the compression. In the event of failure of physiotherapy systematically proposed as first-line treatment, a surgical treatment can be performed. Resection of the second rib is a surgical option in case of a new costoclavicular compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.