ArticleBMC medical education2026
Applying machine learning models to predict and identify factors affecting academic performance of paramedical students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcademic performance is a key indicator of student success and institutional effectiveness in higher education, especially in paramedical fields where precision and competence are essential. Yet traditional methods often miss these complex factors. This study utilizes machine learning to predict performance and identify key influences among paramedical students, providing data-driven insights to inform the improvement of educational strategies.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 135 paramedical students at Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Iran, using convenience sampling. The dataset was constructed by combining face-to-face, paper-based self-administered questionnaire responses with students’ academic records obtained from the university’s Central Education Office. Validated questionnaires assessed demographics and failure/success factors. We applied Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Gradient Boosting models to predict outcomes and estimate feature importance. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, AUC, and G-mean with an 80:20 train–test split, and results were averaged over 10 iterations.
resultsThe Random Forest model excelled at predicting academic failure, achieving an accuracy of 90.74%, an F1-score of 76.19%, and an AUC of 96.19%, highlighting its precision in identifying at-risk students. Conversely, Gradient Boosting outperformed in predicting academic success, with an accuracy of 90.74%, an F1-score of 94.25%, and an AUC of 93.45%, demonstrating its ability to recognize improvement trends effectively. High school GPA emerged as the most important predictor of both outcomes, followed by academic traits and educational factors. Exploratory decision tree visualizations indicated possible hierarchical interactions, such as those potentially linking regional quotas and field of study to failure risk, and gender to success pathways; however, given the instability of decision trees on small datasets, these patterns are preliminary and require validation in larger cohorts. This study advances the application of machine learning in educational research, providing actionable insights for targeted interventions and policy refinement in paramedical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.