ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Comparative effects of static stretching, PNF, MET, Graston, and foam rolling on hamstring flexibility in adolescent soccer players: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: One of the common injuries in soccer is hamstring strain, so improving hamstring flexibility can partially prevent the occurrence of these injuries. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of six weeks of static stretching (SS), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), muscle energy technique (MET), gross tonic technique (GT), and foam rolling (FR) on hamstring flexibility in adolescent male soccer players.
methodsNinety male soccer players (mean aged = 13.01 ± 1.11 years) were randomly assigned to five intervention groups and a control group (n = 15 each), underwent a 6-week intervention, with flexibility assessed pre- and post-intervention using a universal goniometer and the active knee extension test.
resultsOne-way ANCOVA, controlling for pretest values, showed a significant difference between groups (F(5, 83) = 22.79, p < 0.001, η² = 0.57). All intervention groups showed significant improvement compared to control (p < 0.001). The GT group was superior to MET (p = 0.01; Cohen’s d = − 1.23), PNF (p = 0.004; Cohen’s d = − 1.40), and FR (p = 0.02; Cohen’s d = − 1.19), but no difference was observed with SS (p > 0.05; Cohen’s d = − 0.75).
conclusionAll methods improved hamstring flexibility, but GT was the most effective (except when compared with SS). These findings suggest the potential use of GT in training programs to reduce injury and improve performance in adolescent soccer players. However, since the study included only adolescent male players and no long-term follow-up was performed, generalizability is limited.
trial registrationRegistry: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; registration number: IRCT20240306061185N2; date of registration: 08/03/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.