ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Navigating an ambiguous abortion terrain in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: autonomy and relational dynamics in pregnancy termination.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthiopia liberalized its abortion law in 2004 and issued technical guidelines in 2006 to expand access to legal and safe abortion services. However, the implementation of this progressive policy is shaped by stigma, patriarchal norms, and influential actors. As a result, women seeking abortion are required either to negotiate these power dynamics or to go through unsafe procedures. Despite this policy overhaul, there is a paucity of data on how women navigate complex abortion landscape. Therefore, this paper explores how women in Addis Ababa exercise relational autonomy amidst the multiple factors that influence abortion decisions.
methodsThis study involved a total of 16 participants purposively selected from two sexual and reproductive healthcare providers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. While 13 women (10 seeking abortion and three who had recently undergone the procedure) participated in in-depth interviews, three health professionals participated in key informant interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework. Susan Sherwin’s (1998) relational autonomy theory guided the analytical process and provided the conceptual lens.
resultsThe study found that abortion decisions are shaped by multiple actors, including male partners, friends, and health professionals, who provide emotional, informational and financial support. However, the final decision rests with the woman, who strategically determines whom to involve and when based, among other things, on the potential implication of her decision. Thus, women exercise agency through the strategic negotiation and navigation of the influence exerted by individuals within their immediate social networks.
conclusionWomen’s agency in abortion decisions is shaped by social and relational constraints rather than being a purely individual decision. By selectively engaging support networks, women navigate socio-economic barriers to assert control over their choices. Multi-level strategies, including the strengthening of support systems and involving men as “partners in care” can foster such supportive environments and enhance women’s autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.