ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2026
Recruiting people who inject drugs (PWID) into research: benefits and challenges of respondent driven sampling (RDS) in a sample in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople who inject drugs (PWID) are often excluded in research due to social circumstances and a lack of creativity when recruiting this community. Respondent driven sampling (RDS) is one method used to access marginalised and stigmatised communities such as PWID. This study piloted RDS with PWID in eThekwini District, South Africa, and also explored participants’ perspectives of the usefulness of this approach to recruit PWID.
methodsIn-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with 10 key stakeholders, followed by a cross-sectional survey among 45 PWID recruited via RDS. Further, 11 of these PWID participated in IDIs. Survey data were entered into REDCap and descriptively analysed. IDIs were transcribed, translated and thematically analysed using Dedoose software.
resultsParticipants described barriers and facilitators accessing PWID for research. Access to PWID was viewed as challenging because of factors including stigma and concerns of criminalisation. However, making use of PWID networks and peers was felt to be important to facilitate recruitment. RDS was described as an acceptable recruitment strategy, and was rated as “not burdensome” by most (98%). RDS was successfully carried out in this pilot. Participation of PWID in research was viewed as important, but challenging. It was felt that participation of PWID could be impacted by concerns of opioid withdrawal, therefore timing (length and time) of participation was important to consider in study design. Reimbursement strategies for PWID participating in research were discussed. Incentives for participation, including cash reimbursement, were viewed favourably for PWID.
conclusionsRDS is plausible for recruitment of PWID in eThekwini District, South Africa. It can be used to further understand PWID networks and to better serve them for future research and appropriate care.
trial registrationN/A, not a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.