ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Physical fitness differences in elite youth U17 and U18 basketball players by team ranking and position.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in physical fitness between different ranked and age youth basketball players. 382 youth basketball players (U18: n = 190; U17: n = 192) participated in the study. Players` sprint, vertical jump, standing long jumps, sit-ups, sit-and-reach and shuttle run were tested before National Tournament Camp. And players were divided into the top 50% and bottom 50% based on team ranking in the tournament table. Independent T test with effect size was used for analysis. Overall, physical fitness profiles were largely similar between U17 and U18 players. U17 players were significantly faster than the U18 players in sprint and shuttle run (p < 0.05, d=-0.60 to -0.87), and their vertical jump was significantly lower than that of U18 players (p < 0.05, d=-0.31). Regarding different rankings, the U17 top ranking players were significantly faster than the bottom ranking players in sprinting speed (p < 0.05, d=-0.29) and had a significantly higher vertical jump height (p < 0.05, d = 0.36) than the bottom ranking players. Besides, all physical abilities were significantly different between positions (p < 0.05) except for sit-and-reach (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that physical fitness characteristics are broadly comparable between elite U17 and U18 basketball players, suggesting that major physical development may have largely stabilized by late adolescence. Positional demands appear to exert a stronger influence on fitness profiles than chronological age or team ranking at this stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.