ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Detection of simulated complications in all-polymer PEEK knee prostheses: a cadaveric imaging study using Radiography, CT, and MRI.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAll-polymer polyetheretherketone (PEEK) knee prostheses are being developed as an alternative to metal implants, offering benefits like bone-like elasticity, wear resistance, and the absence of clinically relevant metal artefacts on imaging. Their radiological characteristics and complications have not been systematically studied. This study describes the imaging features of a new all-polymer PEEK knee prosthesis and assesses the detection of simulated complications with radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cadaver models.
methodsThe study followed Article 68, paragraph 1 of the Dutch Civil Code for the lawful use of human cadaver material, and all procedures met institutional and national ethical guidelines. Four cadaveric lower limbs were implanted with cemented PEEK knee prostheses (PEEK femoral and polyethylene tibial components). Radiography, CT, and MRI were used to evaluate both typical postoperative findings and four simulated complications: prosthesis loosening, cement fracture, implant migration, and prosthesis fracture. An experienced fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist assessed the visibility and diagnostic characteristics of each complication.
resultsThe prostheses were clearly visible across all imaging modalities, allowing reliable assessment of the implant-cement-bone interface without relevant metal artefacts. Cement fractures were detected on all radiographs, though visibility varied by projection. CT distinguished PEEK and polyethylene based on radiodensity and provided the most complete structural overview of all simulated complications. T2-weighted MRI was the most sensitive modality for detecting fluid at the implant-cement interface and identifying interface separation.
conclusionsAll-polymer PEEK knee prostheses demonstrate favourable imaging characteristics in a cadaveric setting, without any clinically relevant metal-related artefacts and with good visibility of simulated implant complications across radiography, CT, and MRI. These findings suggest potential imaging advantages for future clinical follow-up of polymer-based implant systems, although direct comparative clinical studies are required for confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.