Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709215›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation (London, England)2026

Simplified flow cytometric quantification of human neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs).

G Rinaldi, K K W Cheng, C McCann, F Rossi, M Rodriguez-Rios, K Dhaliwal, A Bebes, L Duncan, R Yuecel, Adriano G Rossi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

G Rinaldi *Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK.
K K W Cheng *Centre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK.
C McCannCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK.
F RossiCentre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK.
M Rodriguez-RiosEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, Joseph Black Building, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 3FJ, UK.
K DhaliwalCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK.
A BebesIain Fraser Cytometry Centre, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK.
L DuncanIain Fraser Cytometry Centre, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK.
R YuecelIain Fraser Cytometry Centre, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Adriano G RossiCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK. Adriano.Rossi@ed.ac.uk.
Calum T RobbCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH16 4UU, UK. calum.robb@thermofisher.com.

Funding

Antimicrobial Resistance UK (AMR) cross-council funding from the MRC to the SHIELD consortium MRNO2995X/1Medical Research Council MRC/K013386/1OPTIMA EP/L016559/1Wellcome Trust 320097/Z/24/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several cellular pathways lead to the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a form of cell death (NETosis), distinct from apoptotic and necrotic cell death. Surprisingly, there remains a paucity of methods enabling efficient quantification of NETosis and associated pathways. Here, we describe the development of a simple, sensitive, reliable and flexible flow cytometry assay allowing efficient detection and quantification of NETosis. For the core assay, isolated primary human neutrophils were incubated with stimulants e.g. PMA/ionomycin with or without inhibitors prior to fixing. The fixed cells were then blocked and subsequently incubated in anti-DNA/Histone 1 and anti-histone H2A antibodies for dual detection of Histone 1 and Histone H2A. Cells with were H1-DNA/H2A double fluorescent were deemed NETotic. Imaging flow cytometry was used to validate the accuracy of NETosis detection/quantification. Several key pathways of NETosis were confirmed via the use of established NET-inducers in accordance with existing established methodologies. Importantly, our novel flow cytometry-based NETosis detection assay could efficiently discriminate NETosis from established neutrophil activation, as well as apoptotic and necrotic cell death. We believe our methodology will complement existing NETosis methodologies whilst concomitantly reducing human error, subjectivity and, indeed the false positivity (attained from neutrophil activation and other cell death processes) inherent in existing methodologies. Furthermore, the simplicity and flexibility of our methodology permit additional markers and pathways of NETosis to be investigated, highlighting it as an integral research tool for both general NETosis research and the pursuit to better understand the pathogenesis of NETosis-associated diseases.

Indexed as

Calcium ionophoreFlow cytometryImaging flow cytometryNADPH oxidaseNETNET detectionNETosisNET quantificationNeutrophil extracellular traps

Identifiers

PMID41709215
PMCPMC12947343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.