ArticleBMC oral health2026
"We try our best": a qualitative study of care staff's perspectives on oral health care for persons with disabilities.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersons with disabilities generally have poorer oral health than persons without disabilities, which negatively affects their quality of life. As caregivers play an important role, this study investigated how oral health care is organised and performed by care staff in residential care settings, and examined the barriers and enablers they experience.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted within the social constructionist research paradigm. Eight semi-structured focus group interviews and three individual interviews were carried out between November 2019 and January 2023 with a total of 43 female care staff members from 16 residential care organisations. Data analysis was guided by reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsFour major themes were identified. Care staff were aware of clients’ oral health needs but faced difficulties in managing them. They faced challenges in both providing daily oral health care and planning professional oral health care. Ineffective coping strategies such as lowering standards, distancing oral health care from general care, and externalising responsibility were reported (Theme 1). Furthermore, oral health was perceived as a source of tension within the organisation, including conflicts with clients or their network, within and between staff teams, and across different organisational levels (Theme 2). Care staff mentioned setting-related challenges, including the diversity of clients and variations in workflows and organisational structures within and between organisations (Theme 3). Despite these challenges, several enablers were identified, including the availability of clear guidelines, tailored training, and collaboration with external partners (Theme 4).
conclusionsCare staff in residential settings for persons with disabilities face persistent challenges in providing oral health care. However, the enablers identified in this study offer valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking to improve oral health in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.