ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Chronic kidney disease in Norwegian primary care: underdiagnosis and undertreatment - findings from the VISTAKID (Vestfold Investigation of Stage 3-5 Kidney Disease) study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic kidney disease (CKD) is common yet frequently unrecognized in primary care. We aimed to quantify the burden of CKD stages 3–5 identified via routine general practice (GP) testing, compare characteristics of patients known vs unknown to nephrology, and estimate population prevalence to inform shared-care pathways.
methodsWe assembled a laboratory cohort of adults whose serum creatinine tests were ordered by GPs in Vestfold between April 2010 and January 2021. Individuals with at least one eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were identified, and CKD stages 3–5 were confirmed according to KDIGO criteria (≥2 eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least 90 days apart). eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2009 equation. Hospital registries were used to classify patients as known CKD (diagnosed and followed in nephrology) or unknown CKD (no nephrology diagnosis/follow-up). We compared demographics, CKD stage distribution, and use of laboratory tests related to CKD complications (e.g. acid–base, phosphate, iron indices, proteinuria).
resultsAmong 18,355 individuals with ≥1 eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 13,480 met KDIGO criteria for CKD stages 3–5 (mean eGFR 48 mL/min/1.73 m2; mean age 77 years; 56% women). Of these, 1952 (15%) were known to nephrology, leaving 11,531 (≈85%) without a registered CKD diagnosis or nephrology follow-up. Disease severity differed by care status: stages 3b–5 accounted for 54% among known CKD vs 28% among unknown CKD. Testing patterns suggested underuse of key CKD complication assessments in primary care—particularly quantification of proteinuria and labs for metabolic acidosis, hyperphosphatemia, and iron status—whereas such tests were more common among patients followed in nephrology. The estimated cumulative period prevalence of CKD stages 3–5 in Vestfold was 3.7% over the study period.
conclusionAcross the study period, the vast majority of patients with laboratory-confirmed CKD stages 3–5 identified in primary care were not known to nephrology, indicating substantial gaps in diagnosis and risk stratification. Limited use of proteinuria testing and complication-focused laboratory assessments likely contributes to missed recognition and delayed treatment. Implementation priorities include systematic albuminuria measurement, streamlined decision support for GPs, and accessible specialist input (e-consults/virtual triage) to improve detection and management without overwhelming clinic capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.