Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709175›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2026

Chronic kidney disease in Norwegian primary care: underdiagnosis and undertreatment - findings from the VISTAKID (Vestfold Investigation of Stage 3-5 Kidney Disease) study.

Sadollah Abedini, Morten Lindberg, Thea Bjune, Thea Bjerkestrand Bøe, Anders Hartmann, Trond Geir Jenssen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sadollah AbediniSykehuset i Vestfold, Kidney Section, Tønsberg, Norway. sadollah.abedini@siv.no.
Morten LindbergSykehuset i Vestfold, Central Laboratory, Tønsberg, Norway.
Thea BjuneSykehuset i Vestfold, Kidney Section, Tønsberg, Norway.
Thea Bjerkestrand BøeSykehuset i Vestfold, Kidney Section, Tønsberg, Norway.
Anders HartmannDepartment for Medical Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Trond Geir JenssenOslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic kidney disease (CKD) is common yet frequently unrecognized in primary care. We aimed to quantify the burden of CKD stages 3–5 identified via routine general practice (GP) testing, compare characteristics of patients known vs unknown to nephrology, and estimate population prevalence to inform shared-care pathways.

methodsWe assembled a laboratory cohort of adults whose serum creatinine tests were ordered by GPs in Vestfold between April 2010 and January 2021. Individuals with at least one eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were identified, and CKD stages 3–5 were confirmed according to KDIGO criteria (≥2 eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at least 90 days apart). eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI 2009 equation. Hospital registries were used to classify patients as known CKD (diagnosed and followed in nephrology) or unknown CKD (no nephrology diagnosis/follow-up). We compared demographics, CKD stage distribution, and use of laboratory tests related to CKD complications (e.g. acid–base, phosphate, iron indices, proteinuria).

resultsAmong 18,355 individuals with ≥1 eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 13,480 met KDIGO criteria for CKD stages 3–5 (mean eGFR 48 mL/min/1.73 m2; mean age 77 years; 56% women). Of these, 1952 (15%) were known to nephrology, leaving 11,531 (≈85%) without a registered CKD diagnosis or nephrology follow-up. Disease severity differed by care status: stages 3b–5 accounted for 54% among known CKD vs 28% among unknown CKD. Testing patterns suggested underuse of key CKD complication assessments in primary care—particularly quantification of proteinuria and labs for metabolic acidosis, hyperphosphatemia, and iron status—whereas such tests were more common among patients followed in nephrology. The estimated cumulative period prevalence of CKD stages 3–5 in Vestfold was 3.7% over the study period.

conclusionAcross the study period, the vast majority of patients with laboratory-confirmed CKD stages 3–5 identified in primary care were not known to nephrology, indicating substantial gaps in diagnosis and risk stratification. Limited use of proteinuria testing and complication-focused laboratory assessments likely contributes to missed recognition and delayed treatment. Implementation priorities include systematic albuminuria measurement, streamlined decision support for GPs, and accessible specialist input (e-consults/virtual triage) to improve detection and management without overwhelming clinic capacity.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedCreatinineFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPrevalenceUndertreatmentCreatinineChronic kidney diseaseKDIGONephrology referralNorwayPrevalencePrimary careProteinuria

Identifiers

PMID41709175
PMCPMC12988603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.