Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709162›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026

Psychological care in acute and emergency medicine: a scoping review of support interventions by healthcare professionals.

Johanna Rutetzki, Jessica Breuing, Käthe Goossen, Franka Lucius, Thomas Ostermann, Katharina Fetz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The challenges and opportunities of major trauma care in Germany - results of multidisciplinary expert interviews of the LeAf trauma study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna RutetzkiInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany. Johanna.Rutetzki@uni-wh.de.
Jessica BreuingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Käthe GoossenInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Franka LuciusInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas OstermannDepartment of Psychology, Chair of Research Methodology and Statistics in Psychology, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Katharina FetzInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical emergency situations can be highly distressing for patients and potentially lead to the development of psychological disorders. While psychological care and interventions are of obvious necessity to assist patients when coping with emergency situations, research regarding appropriate psychological care of prehospital and clinical emergency patients is limited. This scoping review provides an overview of the current state of research in emergency medicine with particular focus on communication strategies as well as psychological interventions. The aim is to present an overview of the psychological support recommended for or available to emergency patients.

methodsPubMed and PsycInfo were searched for eligible articles on psychological interventions or communication styles that assist acute and emergency adult patients in coping with the critical incident. The search started in June 2023 and was repeated in June 2024.

resultsThe literature search resulted in 1080 articles. Ultimately, 26 articles were eligible for inclusion. The majority of articles focused on major and general trauma patients. Study settings involved emergency rooms, emergency medical services, burn units, intensive care units and other acute medical settings, such as maternity wards. While research results are heterogeneous due to a wide variety of interventions, there is evidence that patients require (psycho-)education and information regarding diagnosis and treatment to reduce psychological distress and maintain or regain mental health.

conclusionsThis scoping review shows that the existing interventions and recommendations are too heterogeneous to recommend a universal approach for healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, (psycho-)education and informing patients has been demonstrated to be an effective means of reducing patients’ psychological distress and maintaining mental health. Further research is required to identify the most effective methods for assisting patients. REGISTRATION NUMBER: This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework on 29 May 2024 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GJ4EX ). Clinical trial number: not applicable.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicineHealth PersonnelPsychosocial InterventionStress, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansCommunicationEmergency medicineEmergency treatmentPatient carePsychological first aidPsychological interventionPsychological trauma

Identifiers

PMID41709162
PMCPMC12930831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.